Comments on: theological disciplines https://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/ fundamentalism by blunt instrument Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: ox https://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/comment-page-1/#comment-3328 Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:46:11 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/#comment-3328 In reply to Duncan.

Thanks buddy. I found a bunch of material on van Til, downloaded it to my laptop, but now my laptop is acting funky…. hopefully I can be more educated on these things soon.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

]]> By: Duncan https://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/comment-page-1/#comment-3321 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:40:55 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/#comment-3321 You might want to check out John Muether’s Cornelius Van Til: Reformed Apologist and Churchman for an introduction to Van Til and presuppositionalism. I haven’t read this myself, but I’ve read some good reviews.

]]> By: Kent https://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/comment-page-1/#comment-3318 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:55:36 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/#comment-3318 No absolute rejection, I understand. I was trying to express it as quickly as possible. The three paragraphs do a good job of explaining it.

]]> By: ox https://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/comment-page-1/#comment-3317 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:41:12 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/#comment-3317 In reply to Kent.

Thanks for the link. The article doesn’t seem like absolute rejection.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

]]> By: Kent https://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/comment-page-1/#comment-3316 Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:16:52 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/2009/04/18/theological-disciplines/#comment-3316 It is helpful to read Van Til and his rejection of Warfield. See the Kuyper-Warfield section of Van Til’s bio here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelius_Van_Til

]]>