Comments on: a series you should read

By: ox

ox — Sun, 09 May 2010 03:23:18 +0000

In reply to Ryan.

Ryan, thanks for commenting. Could you point out the ad hominem in the argument that Gordon is making? I don’t want to assume and argue against something you might not be saying, so if you could spell it out, I could respond to your comment better.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

By: Lou Martuneac

Lou Martuneac — Sun, 09 May 2010 02:17:23 +0000

Don: Thanks to linking to this important series. I also linked to and recommended it heartily, Part 8 in particular. BTW, I had an advance look at the next installment, it is a worthy read. LM

By: Brian Ernsberger

Brian Ernsberger — Sat, 08 May 2010 21:17:52 +0000

Well, Bro. Don we seem to keep crossing paths at various sites. Thanks for posting this series, I too have stumbled across it but have not read the entire series yet. Had read Dr. Bauder’s series when he was putting them out and was a bit perturbed by his poor handling of the history of Fundamentalism. Dr. Bauder’s constant little, tweaking/redefining of terms and such have had me wondering if he is not setting up his readers for some kind of shifting within Fundamentalism some time in the near future. I could very well be wrong but those pesky little red flags keep popping up in my mind when I read anything Dr. Bauder or others of like mind write. Something is not right and something must give way.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Sat, 08 May 2010 21:09:31 +0000

I am troubled that you recommend this, Don. I guess I assumed you did not approve of ad hominem argumentation.