Comments on: hoorah, I guess

By: ox

ox — Fri, 02 Nov 2012 04:09:21 +0000

Hi Arlyn

Well, you know I don’t agree. The point isn’t the music, it isn’t the ability of Stonebriar. The point is that associations matter. There are plenty of high-quality musicians who don’t carry the baggage of Grace Awakening that Chris could have collaborated with.

It’s extremely disappointing that Chris would choose to do this. But not too surprising, given the trends he has exhibited over the last few years.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

By: arlyn ubben

arlyn ubben — Fri, 02 Nov 2012 04:04:32 +0000

Don,
I applaud Chris and his work and his collaboration with Don McMinn. We have used his music on many occasions. I introduced some of his hymns to our school and we have used them in chapel.. Ours presentation was surely not as polished as Stonebriar’s would be, but it has ministered to our students and has given them a higher view of God and the worship which He seeks. Praise God for musicians who will compose and arrange and take the unwarranted criticism which they will receive, for the glory of God. I look forward to obtaining a copy of the recording so I can help to raise the musical awareness of our students and to further encourage them toward excellence in music.

By: ox

ox — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:39:51 +0000

In reply to Dan.

In reply to Dan, I sent him a private link. Dan is over in Europe and is probably glad not to be fully in the loop with the goings on back here.

Kent, yes… well, I hesitate to be more than oblique because one wonders if it is worth the trouble after awhile.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

By: Kent Brandenburg

Kent Brandenburg — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:42:09 +0000

It would interesting to explore how that fellowship with Chuck Swindoll fits into a fundamentalist understanding of ecclesiastical separation. I would think it is this: Chuck believes the gospel. The fundamentalist fellowshiper’s unity is core rather than boundary driven. That’s the language I’m hearing today that is moving the conversation It as if the only reason nobody fellowshiped with Chuck before is because no one was big time enough, not important or talented enough to gain Chuck’s recognition. Now we have someone with the greatness to no longer escape his coveted notice. And if you criticize, I’ll bring up either the president of the FBFI at the Crown conference or Chuck Phelps. End of discussion.

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:28:55 +0000

OK Don, I’ll bite. What on earth are you talking about?