Comments on: apostasy https://oxgoad.ca/2013/01/18/apostasy/ fundamentalism by blunt instrument Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:10:49 +0000 hourly 1 By: Dale Heffernan https://oxgoad.ca/2013/01/18/apostasy/comment-page-1/#comment-31393 Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:10:49 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/?p=2088#comment-31393 Don, thanks for standing firmly and kindly on the Scriptures. Lord bless you for taking all the arrows you have taken lately.

]]>
By: ox https://oxgoad.ca/2013/01/18/apostasy/comment-page-1/#comment-30556 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:22:57 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/?p=2088#comment-30556 In reply to Kent Brandenburg.

Wasn’t so much of a debate, more a snide remark by one of those I was debating on SI, referring to something I said about Northland here. Got me thinking on the topic, though.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

]]>
By: Kent Brandenburg https://oxgoad.ca/2013/01/18/apostasy/comment-page-1/#comment-30542 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:02:55 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/?p=2088#comment-30542 Don,

I didn’t see the original debate about apostasy, but I just looked at what fundamentalism is at SharperIron, and I can see how that a finer tuned understanding of apostasy would touch a nerve with many. SI says fundamentalists separate from apostasy. How do you do that? When is someone apostatizing? Obviously, if you wait until someone starts himself preaching a plainly (plain to SI folks, which might require a more involved standard of plainness) false gospel, you won’t separate for awhile, or can always claim deniability, because it wasn’t plain yet. If I separate from apostasy and apostasy is in essence no less than the pope, I’ve got a lot of room not to separate. It pretty much means I can claim being a fundamentalist by my own definition without in fact being one. I can say I believe in Jesus, but if He is a jar of peanut butter, I don’t really believe in Him, if you get what I mean.

]]>
By: Kent Brandenburg https://oxgoad.ca/2013/01/18/apostasy/comment-page-1/#comment-30257 Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:46:55 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/?p=2088#comment-30257 You are correct Don. They were presenting a red herring.

]]>
By: Brian Ernsberger https://oxgoad.ca/2013/01/18/apostasy/comment-page-1/#comment-30170 Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:38:40 +0000 http://oxgoad.ca/?p=2088#comment-30170 Oh, boy! Don, I bet you were way-laided with such talk about current ministries! I daresay the be-all, end-all verse thrown back you was Matt. 7:1 “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” You’re also a dispensationalist, premillennial, pre-trib rapturist, who just doesn’t get it that the world is not getting worse and worse. Man, the kingdom of God is being ushered in by all these ministries! Heaven on earth is just ahead, that’s the light at the end of the tunnel that we see. (I am speaking facetiously here with a bit of sarcasm tossed in for good measure) The more I read, see, hear some men, the more I realize that we are not talking the same talk. The literal, grammatical hermeneutic that I employ is not compatible with those of a reformed/covenant hermeneutic, we are not talking the same language as we talk the Scriptures. Words may be the same but they have different meanings between us. Much like talking to a Mormon, our words are the same but our respective meanings for those words are radically different.
Thanks for the article. A good study of apostasy and what it’s doing in our current age.

]]>