{"id":1666,"date":"2010-05-08T09:52:08","date_gmt":"2010-05-08T17:52:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/2010\/05\/08\/a-series-you-should-read\/"},"modified":"2010-05-11T16:48:52","modified_gmt":"2010-05-12T00:48:52","slug":"a-series-you-should-read","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/2010\/05\/08\/a-series-you-should-read\/","title":{"rendered":"a series you should read"},"content":{"rendered":"

I ran across a blog that is new to me. On this blog there is an ongoing series of articles with this title:<\/p>\n

Considerations Concerning the Proclamation of a Post-Fundamentalism Era and the Foundations for Paleo-Evangelicalism<\/strong><\/p>\n

The author explains his purpose in the first Part:<\/p>\n

In this series of posts I shall attempt to give answers concerning the following:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Whether Fundamentalism was flawed from its beginning by Scottish Common Sense Realism, sentimentalism, and populism or whether it rests more squarely upon Biblical principles;<\/li>\n
  2. Whether Fundamentalism was only a \u201cpartial<\/strong> and uneducated\u201d<\/strong> return to the Biblical faith because it lacks in its appreciation for the history of theological development in contrast to those who are primarily interested in defending the Reformed faith;<\/li>\n
  3. Whether Fundamentalism should be broader in its vision and burden and be more culturally concerned as is the amillennialist\u00a0 because of his kingdom-is-now theology and the post-millennialist because of his establish-the-kingdom theology;<\/li>\n
  4. Whether Fundamentalism should be actively listening to, dialoguing with, or learning from those outside of itself for the purpose of better spiritual growth and maturity;<\/li>\n
  5. Whether the historical lines of separation for Fundamentalists should be scrapped in favor of fresh approaches meant to allow fellowship and cooperation with Conservative Evangelicals; and<\/li>\n
  6. Whether we are actually now in a post-Fundamentalism era and in need of something new namely Paleo-evangelicalism.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    This series is a response to Bauder\u2019s recent series of articles trying to tell the history and philosophy of Fundamentalism (and making several errors along the way). I think the whole series is worth your attention and so I am providing links to each article below:<\/p>\n