{"id":1819,"date":"2011-01-25T21:53:55","date_gmt":"2011-01-26T05:53:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/2011\/01\/25\/contend-defend\/"},"modified":"2011-01-25T21:53:55","modified_gmt":"2011-01-26T05:53:55","slug":"contend-defend","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/2011\/01\/25\/contend-defend\/","title":{"rendered":"contend = defend?"},"content":{"rendered":"

I recently listened to a message purporting to be an exposition of the book of Jude. Several points in the message were derived out of the speaker\u2019s experience (or his perception of his experience). These points in the main were questionable. One man\u2019s experience is no authority and another man\u2019s experience quite often differs. One man sees fundamentalists as primarily lovers of the fight, whereas another man sees them as lovers of the faith. But whose experience is right? It is true that some men seem simply to be contentious, but how well do we know them and the entire scope of their ministry?<\/p>\n

In addition the message purported to be on the subject of separation, but Jude is not a separation passage. As such the message seemed conflicted from the beginning, as text did not match subject.<\/p>\n

The weakest point of the message was the heart of the message. We all know Jude 3 as the rallying cry, the banner of fundamentalism. Here it is:<\/p>\n

\n

Jude 1:3 Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our common salvation, I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In the message, the speaker called his hearers to the Christian duty of defending the faith. Over and over again came the phrase, defend the faith, defend the faith, defend the faith.<\/p>\n

Well\u2026 is that what Jude said?<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Here is the primary definition of \u2018defend\u2019 from the Merriam-Webster dictionary:<\/p>\n

\n

1 a : to drive danger or attack away from ?defend our shores?
    b (1) : to maintain or support in the face of argument or hostile criticism ?defend a theory?
        (2) : to prove (as a doctoral thesis) valid by answering questions in an oral exam
    c : to attempt to prevent an opponent from scoring at ?elects to defend the south goal<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Defend<\/em>, according to this definition has the connotation of resistance<\/em>, of standing up against an attack<\/em>. In the synonym section of the definition, M-W gives us this \u201cDEFEND denotes warding off actual or threatened attack.\u201d Is that what contend<\/em> means?<\/p>\n

Merriam-Webster on contend<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\n

  1 : to strive or vie in contest or rivalry or against difficulties: STRUGGLE
  2 : to strive in debate : ARGUE verb transitive
  1 : MAINTAIN, ASSERT ?contended that he was right?
  2 : to struggle for : CONTEST<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

But more important than the English definition for Jude 1.3 is the lexical information for the underlying Greek verb, epagonizomai. It is used here as an infinitive in Indirect Discourse. The controlling verb: \u2018I beseech\u2019 or \u2018I urge you\u2019 is a verb of communication that takes an infinitive of Indirect Discourse, a statement of the content of the beseeching. In other words, if we were to put it into Direct Discourse, the verse would go something like this:<\/p>\n

\n

I felt the necessity to write to you, \u201cContend earnestly for the faith\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The controlling verb adds urgency and imperatival force, since an infinitive can have either an imperative or indicative sense (\u2018you are contending earnestly for the faith\u2019). Since Jude is beseeching them, we can see that he intends the imperative.<\/p>\n

What does the word mean?<\/p>\n

The root of the word is \u2018agon\u2019, a contest, struggle, or fight and is a compound of the verb \u2018agonizomai\u2019, to struggle, to fight. The preposition that makes the compound \u2018epagonizomai\u2019 intensifies the struggle, \u2018to struggle on behalf of, to struggle for\u2019.<\/p>\n

Here are a few lexical definitions: \u201cstruggle for, contend, fight\u201d ((Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains)) <\/em>; \u201cto exert intense effort on behalf of something\u2014\u2018to struggle for\u2019\u201d ((Louw-Nida)) [as opposed to antagonizomai, \u2018to struggle against\u2019]; and it \u201csignifies \u2018to contend about a thing, as a combatant\u2019 (epi, \u2018upon or about,\u2019 intensive, agon, \u2018a contest\u2019), \u2018to contend earnestly,\u2019 Jude 3. The word \u2018earnestly\u2019 is added to convey the intensive force of the preposition.\u201d ((Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words<\/em>))<\/p>\n

Now then\u2026<\/p>\n

Does \u2018contend\u2019 mean \u2018defend\u2019? Is it not a much more aggressive word than \u2018defend\u2019? Doesn\u2019t it convey the idea of taking the battle to the streets, even launching attacks in favor of the object of contention, \u2018the faith\u2019? I think it does.<\/p>\n

The battle to be waged is against all sorts of deceptive persons who for their own lusts and personal gain have crept into the church to devour its saints and pervert the faith once delivered. The Christian needs to be more than defensive when it comes to such deceptive persons. He needs to be on the offense. (I hesitate to say \u2018offensive\u2019!) He needs to contend. He needs to struggle intensely on behalf of the faith.<\/p>\n

Is the fulfillment of this urgent imperative a matter of being more interested in the fight or being more interested in the \u2018gospel\u2019 as the speaker alleged at one point? I think that is the wrong question. If you aren\u2019t interested in the fight, you aren\u2019t interested in the gospel. If you won\u2019t contend, but only defend, do you really love the gospel?<\/p>\n

\"don_sig2\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I recently listened to a message purporting to be an exposition of the book of Jude. Several points in the message were derived out of the speaker\u2019s experience (or his perception of his experience). These points in the main were questionable. One man\u2019s experience is no authority and another man\u2019s experience quite often differs. One […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[71,44],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2fYWj-tl","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1819"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oxgoad.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}